Fathers have lost their constitutional 1st and 14th amendment rights

Fathers are losing their rights by the thousands every day. No one listens and if they can find the one person to hear them the price tag is astounding. Family courts ignore the real law every day for their own convenience and personal agenda. Some judges because they are biased and others because the current practice of every other week end is the norm.
What right does the government have to tell a father he can only see his children every other week end, because the mom is the normal choice. This should not be a choice. This was a choice when you crawled into bed with that man and created a child, this choice took two. The raising of the same child should take two.
The courts pass out child support like it is candy, the mother gets to stay home and collect the money, while the father is left to pay outragous costs, the more he works the more he pays and yet sees his child 4 days out of each month. Leaving the mother to believe that she doesn't have to support her own child (and the choice she made to create that baby). The courts will 98% of the time side with her because of her gender. This is not only against the 14th amendment, but against the child to have a loving relationship with the father. Most parents find their children their life, to love and raise that little person into a wonderful, productive adult. Some where these judges have determined that only the mother thinks of the child as their life. Fathers have commited suicide due to the unfair bias of the courts and losing hope. Mothers tend to use the child against the fathers with no regard as to how this will effect their work, future, mind, and later loves. The only thing they see is the dollar, and how much can they get for this baby. A father has been turned into, not an important part of a childs life but into a twice a month babysitter to give the mom a break. The law according to the Supreme Court of the United States of America, implies that " a once married father who is spearated or divorced from a mother and is no longer living with his child" " Can not constitutionally be treated differently from a currently married father living with his child. Quilloin v. Walcott, 98S Ct 549; 434 US 246,255-56, (1978).
This is not how most ruling go, and it seems that most of the judges in the US have forgotten this case and ruling.

The rights of parents to the care, custody and nurture of their children is of such character that it can't be denied without violating those fundamental principles of liberty and justice...Doe v. Irwin, 441 F Supp 1247; U.S. D.C. of Michigan, 1985
The US Supreme Court held that the "old notion" that "gnerally it is the man's primary responsibility to provide a home and its essentials" can no longer justify a statute that discriminates on the basis of gender. Stanton V. Stanton, 421 US 7, 10; 95 S Ct 1373, 1376, (1975)

Judges must maintain a high standard of judicial performance with particular emphasis upon Conduction litigation with scrupulous fairness and impartiality. 28 USCA, 2411;

Things need to change and the ACLU should take this on as a whole. They fight for so many other groups, yet not the American Father and his basic constitutional rights. Why not?